Archive for July, 2009

Case Study from Loyalist College

Saturday, July 18th, 2009


Location: Linden Lab Blog

At our most recent SLER discussion, participants noted how many colleagues and senior administrators ask for case studies when wondering how effective virtual worlds are for education.

Linden Lab trotted out this post July 10, and since I don’t keep up with their blog on a regular basis, I missed it. Have a look at “Virtual World Simulation Training Prepares Real Guards on the US-Canadian Border: Loyalist College in Second Life.”

More on how to get it, from LL:

To learn more, check out this video on YouTube, read this article on the program in the Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, or download our case study PDF.

Border security training seems a reasonable use for simulations. It may be harder to use that particular case to justify a writing class. That said…

Fred Brecher, who’s helping organize the House of Usher project at Richmond, noted in our discussion that many educational technologies have not been subjected to rigorous assessment or case-studies. I suppose virtual worlds are more suspect than, say, a course-management system, since VWs appear game-like.

In time we’ll get more and more such studies of what works and does non in VWs. My own project, under review by readers, is not quantitative but does show what worked well in SL last year, with my writing students.

Dealing with Skeptics on Campus

Friday, July 17th, 2009


Location: SLER weekly Roundtable

Poor AJ Brooks! Our intrepid moderator had a raucous crowd on hand for the discussion of “Non-VW issues” last night. These should have included staff management, budgeting, project-planning, and so forth.

The moon was not full, but it might as well have been. AJ had a chatty and chaotic group of around 40 of us, and we resolutely stayed off-topic until near the end. Some excellent discussion did emerge (I’m combing through our transcript now). A major bone of contention (a fine metaphor, that) was how to convince campus skeptics about SL’s value. These ideas emerged from the swamp of discourse:

  • Objections to SL are not limited to “SL means sex.” See an old post here for more on that! Faculty may see it as merely a “game,” as too complex to invest their time, as only for distance education
  • My Scottish bud Kali, who works heavily with Blackboard, noted that the popular course-management system went through the same process of gaining credibility. Other participants noted how the Web itself, even e-mail, had a bumpy start with faculty and admins
  • The “SL is dying” meme hurts adoption. I suggested that the skeptics look at Tateru Nino’s figures at Massively, where she runs regular updates about usage of SL. I also pointed folks to this site by Virtual World Watch. Kali recommends a study (PDF format) done in the UK about investing in virtual worlds for higher ed
  • The urge to evangelize when we enjoy a technology hurts. As Kimbeau Surveryor put it, “I learned that VW evangelism is worse than being a door-to-door Christian.” Instead, several participants wanted to have case studies in hand to show how SL has helped with learning outcomes. I think I’d point skeptics to the project that Profesora Farigoule’s students completed, combining architecture and social change or other work that could not be done as cheaply (or at all) on the other side of the screen. By the way, I’d show colleagues the work on the flat Web first, before taking them in-world, even “over my shoulder.” That way, they see the potential in a format they respect, and not in something game-like.

Comment of the week goes to CathyWyo1 Haystack:

those who have the most success with using sl are enthusiastic with their students and encourage fun at the same time as learning.

Update for July 17: The entire transcript can be found here.

Thanks to everyone who participated.

Educators Ponder: Are We Our Avatars?

Monday, July 6th, 2009

sler6_32_09_020
Location: SL Education Roundtable Weekly Meeting
Photo Courtesy of Olivia Hotshot

I wasn’t able to make this meeting, but I like the topic. I think readers will, too, though as usual, the transcript is a long slog if you are not used to reading them.

The most interesting points to me are a discussion of how professionally we should dress when we are around our students and colleagues. Some participants at culturally “conservative” institutions in the States or abroad felt that one must wear professional dress, on a human avatar. Others fiercely defended the rights to look as one pleases, as long as the attire stays decent.

Quotation of the meeting goes to AstroGrl Enzo:

I would suggest to someone for a “professional” avatar to have fun with it. Be respectful, don’t have your “parts” hanging out, just have fun with it. Keep your personality and that will come through.

Good advice: I’m a nutcase in both worlds, but I’m fond on a well made European-cut suit, a Brooks Brothers shirt, and a hand-painted silk tie. If the weather were not so hot in Richmond, I’d wear that look year round. To me, that’s both professional and fun, while showing respect for those I meet during the workday. All attire is costume, after all.

I may have to dress the avatar up more now, just to be contrary to the “dress down” sentiment I come across so often in SL. But I like being contrary.